[ad_1] Last October, the Daily Mail reported that: ‘A female doctor could be paid more than £100,000 by her neighbour after a judge ruled that his Ring smart
[ad_1] In Tylicki v Gibbons [2021] EWHC 3470 (QB) the claimant was a professional jockey who sued the defendant, another professional jockey, in relation to a collision that
[ad_1] The low down Public discourse on refugee and asylum policy is polarised: at one extreme is the Home Office policy of ‘turning boats back’; at the other
[ad_1] Why on earth would any solicitor in their right mind want to change area of legal specialism? It would be tantamount to returning to the status of
[ad_1] As law firms look to the year ahead, what key developments will be appearing on the regulatory horizon? We have identified five key areas. 1. Fine time:
[ad_1] The Cambridge Union Society recently had a debate on the subject, This House Believes AI Will Bring More Harm Than Good. The debate consisted of speeches for
[ad_1] The low down Sentences of imprisonment for public protection were abolished in 2012 by the coalition government, which called them ‘not defensible’. Trapping prisoners in jail with
[ad_1] Precisely how much can a cartel or monopolist increase the price of a good over the price that would have prevailed in a competitive market? Any attempt
[ad_1] A joint statement has been issued by the home and justice secretaries announcing another amendment to be included in the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill, currently
